tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7008243.post1994433400286797710..comments2009-05-24T20:30:01.852-05:00Gordon Dhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01048644813784102126noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7008243.post-44470794941897342882009-05-24T20:30:01.852-05:002009-05-24T20:30:01.852-05:00the 2-in-1 xover notwithstanding, I always recalled Doc Savage by Marvel fondly because it DIDN'T have anything to do with Marvel continuity but rather was freestanding.Roger Owen Greenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05298172138307632062noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7008243.post-76504166424205310372009-05-24T05:30:20.091-05:002009-05-24T05:30:20.091-05:00Russ - actually, Conde Nast has been <B>very</B> protective about the Doc copyright, so much so that a pulp-oriented website (blackmask.com) got shut down because they were doing unauthorized reprints.<br /><br />Sam - I actually just reread that issue, and thought it was...well, not that great. <br /><br />Both Sam &amp; Russ - I can see the potential in crossovers; I just wonder if mixing Doc in with too much of the DC Universe dilutes the overall premise....Gordon Dhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01048644813784102126noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7008243.post-19805776400204356452009-05-23T18:27:43.976-05:002009-05-23T18:27:43.976-05:00If done properly, I feel like this could be a great story a la LEAGUE OF EXTRAORDINARY GENTLEMEN, in terms of creating a superhero-esque universe with these characters.<br /><br />I'm surprised Doc isn't public domain.Russ!http://www.blogger.com/profile/07627976533666977653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7008243.post-34413638083515733552009-05-23T12:35:34.831-05:002009-05-23T12:35:34.831-05:00What about the Marvel "Two in One" (think that was the title) when Doc was in a team up with the Thingsamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08933458117793303651noreply@blogger.com